At the very beginning of the video the claim is only specific places are burn and because of that it was some kind of laser used. There are also the negative claims that trees were left untouched as was the parking lot. Lets to look at some fact. Buildings by their nature are contructed of fuel for fires, that is wood framing, regarles of the outer covering brick for example. Generally all man built structures have some from of fuel for fires in their structure and in the case where it showed an Arbys which is a restaraunt, with other fuels gas lines, oil for cooking etc. ensure they will burn fully if not attended by fire fighters. Parking lots are by their very nature not flamable so of course they do not burn. Trees shown have some pretty much untouched, some looked to be half burned if looked at closely and some are fully burned. This is the nature of wild fire.
So checking with a man who works for the US Forest service and fights wild fires for a reason, I found out that someone he went to college with is actually living in Lahaina. He was one of the fortunate ones in that his home and the one to one to the up wind side were not burned at all. The one to the down wind side was burned but not to the ground as the fire ignited the down wind side of that house. The house next to it down wind was fully burned. The point is that wild fires by their very nature often skip spots that never get burned especially if they are fast moving from winds. So the idea that the reason that those burned as opposed to those not burned all belong to the elites is also false. The man living in Maui is not what you would call an elite. He is a middle class working man.
Are the US and other countries developing DEW of the laser version. The answer is yes. They have been at it for about a decade or longer. What is not well known at this time is they are based on aircraft for use. The problem with high energy weapons such as laser they take a massive amount of energy to work sufficient to ignite fires from a distance such as a flying plane. To generate that much energy takes a lot of equipment which means weight. So the laser used on aircraft are not destructive in nature as they can not get enough power to be that way. As I said in another posting if an aircraft was used there are only a few that are outfitted with laser that could be close enough to the ground to have held a laser on a single spot long enough to ignite any fires and they would have been heard flying over head as they are loud and obviouse. Not one mention has been made of any kind of aircraft being heard in the area at the time.
As you look further in to the video and the claim of work since the 1970s would imply they have long since had working models. If so would they have not been used in the Gulf wars and in Afghanistan. Those kinds of weapons are huge money makers for those that bet on wars. Also note the massive equipment show where they are are woking on it. Not likely that will fit in a single airplane. It is just not reasonable to think the US was purposely shooting lasers at the city of Lahaina. Now that does not eliminate another starting source but still until some more investigation is done there is no evidence to prove these outlandish claims.
Then there is the inserted video clip claiming the trees did not burn but They did. I see one that has no leaves. Now the California fires that are referred to happened in the summer yet just the leave are gone and yes they were burned off. Other treas have some leaves and some gon and ther is a structure still standing in the back ground. Simply put the house shown did burn down but the reason for it is not known. Did a gas line snap and add fuel to the burn, was it a rustic style home with a lot of wooden structure and furniture. What was in the garage, maybe stored gas and other flammable solvents. The problem is when creaters like the young man who did the video try to present evidence it is cherry picked to support their claims.
Then there there is the explanation of what it takes a ten story building to create a super laser. Just not feasible to put that on a plane. That is followed by a tree burnng from the inside out and claiming it is microwave technology. Sorry microwave technology deals with radio waves outside the light wave spectrum. So what was the cause of the burning tree radio wave technology or laser technology. It can’t be both. Now litte known fact about wild fires, They can stay buried under ground as burning roots and spread from one tree to another as their roots intertwine or some other fuel source in the ground keeps it going and once it arrives at a new tree can emerge going up the route into the tree and burn from the inside out.
The other part it is stated that some 14 fires were burning at once. Yes many were but the source was not laser. Instead it was a weather phenomena which creates what is called dry lightening. This happens when air at ground level is very dry but, upper levels contain sufficient amount of moisture to generate thick cumulus cloudes that reach the higher altitudes where the necessary factors for lightening exist and it starts. Much of that lightening is clound to ground which means lightning is strikng very dry surface fuel and easily ignites because much of that lightening is producing Short term temps along its path of around 50,000 degrees F. That is more than enough to trigger a spontaneous combustion. It just so happens at the time of those fires California had been in a multiyear drought. It also just happens that copious amounts of moisture had been pumped in over a high surface pressure pushing it high up for the dry lightning to form.
The point of all that I am saying here is that one there are people who get their jollies creating this stuff to scare people. Think of the school bully who gets off terrorizing other kids. Guess what Satan is a school bully. The second is inverably it is a bad choice to jump of the first explanation that you see especially if the people putting it out are not someone you know personally. Think about when you see and hear such stuff about what Pastor JD has been talking about for some time now, “deception.” First question you should ask is whether or not this is a deceptive bit of information and second who benefits from it being spread. Of course the answer to that is the content creater. Every time this kind of sensationalized information is linked here and other places hundreds if not thousands of people click on it. Each click means more money in the content maker’s bank. Youtube monetizes such content based on how many watch it, how many click like, and how many subscribe to the content creaters channel. This is why so many start their videos with the request to click, like, and subscribe. After that look closely at what you are seeing compared to what is being said. They say no trees were burned yet if you look closely you actually see a lot of trees have been burned, leave all gone, trunk charred even if still standing. Well then a claim of no trees burned is an outright lie. That should send up a red flag.
I will finish with this, deception comes in many forms from many sources. Test it all just like you test the spirits. Verify what you are told by comparing it to what you are seeing. Does it match up? If not then likely a lot of information is being twisted to get you to believe what is being said. This is called mind control. These creaters can only get that control if you give it to them.