Hi Jack. Thanks. I understand how you are looking at things. This is a general sense many watchers would see it like this. You, nor this forum, nor JD are alone in this perspective. An0maly also has this same perspective. Which is why i spend so much time listening to him. He is not into eschatology. Iām not certain he is a believer. But he might be like a baby Christian. Hard to say. But his perspective is as concerned as JD and this forum regarding Trump and the GOP. But without the added eschatology perspectives and inferences.
As I have understood An0malyās concerns, it is easier for me to see things of concern, that for me, donāt blur into added eschatological perespective. So it is easier for me to take at face value the concerns without adding too much to it. The view of two sides the same since 1965 came to my awareness in 2017. A few years before i came to this forum. It was at that time i finally got interested in the book of Revelation and the forming importance of Ez 38.
I believe much of it still exists. But i donāt see that view as comprehensive enough though. Because there are other factors seemingly as well at play. It may well be that if Trump gets elected, he just becomes a dud and America tanks. That is a very real possibility. And i understand that possibility. But in the variants i have seen, it is not the only potential outcome. Those holding to a two-bird view donāt seem to be open to any other consideration. But i believe there definately are some. Iām on this forum in the event i might be mistaken about that. Because other than my alternative views to this issue, i side much with how this forum is generically seeing end times. But there are quite a few differences.
EXAMPLES 1
Trump got elected with ālock her up.ā And then said, āYeah that is something you say to get elected.ā And did not pursue her. Although there were investigations into the Clinton org. So Trump got elected in 2016 coming aboard to CrossFire Hurricane. An already inprogress insurance plan to out Trump should he get elected. So Trump, saying he will lock her up, didnāt. But what the other side, the democrat side, did was onboard the president with a āget you outā plan already in place. THEN, he runs in 2024 having not vindictively pursued Hilaryā¦and what awaits him is election interference through the court system. I think this observation is note worthy. Because the dems for 8 years now have gone after Trump as an authoritarian rulerā¦all the whille the dems are that. So if he gets elected, his going after the left will likely not be seen as vindictive because when he had the chance with Hilary, he did not. It was not him who pulled the first real punch. This is important for optics if in play.
EXAMPLE 2
Why didnāt Trump get border wall funding in his first 2 years in office when he had a republican controlled congress? Why did he wait? On this note it is fishy. Yet he was able to get funding even against the tide in his 2nd two years in office. Had the wall been completed, it would not be so easy to see an open āinvationā at the border. Also, i believe, important for optics.
EXAMPLE 3
During the 2020 election as Trump was crying about Pence being weak, something interesting happened. Trump was wanting Pence to send the votes back to the states in question. One main arguement at the time (enjoined by Pence as well) is that the VP did not have the power to do that. Yet, what happened? The dems changed the wording to the statute governing the ability of the VP to send back the votes so that the VP could not do so. Why do that if it was already in law like that? Now, we are at 2024. Where the dems cannot have the VP return the votes to the states in question. Again, optics.
I could go on. But those are perhaps the easiest to digest on the surface. Or at least provide a headscratcher. It is understandable that Trump trends toward weakness in how things look. I get that. His siding with Speaker Johnson to send money to Ukraine is bad. And looks really bad. As for warp speed, there is research out by a high ranking doctor or renown that shows proof that warpspeed was an illusion. And the vax came from the DOD. Which opens up a greater can of worms no doubt. These are complicated nuances. And a huge one of course is Trump and his authorized vaccine.
But the consideration that a shift in political wind direction transcending the two-bird scenario does not seem to reach any shore liine. I understand the concern with false light agendas. But if that is the only or main working filterā¦wellā¦it is good i believe to be open to the āBut Godā factor. Especially in ground swell eschatological considerations. When i see the church too certain on a view, it causes me pause. Especially in light of the above examples. And in addition, the trajectory also outside the countryā¦